Since its beginning in 1949, NATO—the North Atlantic Treaty Organization—has been at the center of U.S. foreign policy. The alliance was crucial during the decades of the Cold War, and the United States collaborated closely with NATO during crises in Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Libya. But does the NATO alliance still serve the best interests of the U.S.?
The NATO of today—one that has expanded to 30 member countries—risks involving the U.S. in unwanted military activities of the future, actions that were not intended in the original Atlantic alliance. In addition, the real challenges for foreign policy of 21st century are not in Europe, but in the expanding economic powerhouses in Asia, especially China. NATO Reconsidered argues that the changes in world politics in recent decades requires that the more than 70-year-old alliance should no longer be the principal focus of U.S. foreign policy.
- Makes an original and contrarian argument openly questioning U.S. participation in NATO in the 21st century
- Takes account of NATO's full history, putting today's international reality into context
- Analyzes surprising data on Germany's growing economic and political ties to Russia, questioning Germany's reliability as a NATO ally
- Reflects the author's unique perspective on NATO stemming from experience in the State Department, in international business, and as a professor teaching world politics with a focus on Europe
- Openly eschews the globalists' "party line" and offers solid analysis and conclusions needed to ensure the U.S.' future security