Topic: Politics, Law and Government / U.S. Public Policy & Administration

 
Abortion Politics in the Federal Courts
Right Versus Right
Barbara M. Yarnold
978-0-31338-816-3

This eBook may be purchased through the following distributors:

 
Barbara M. Yarnold
ADD COPY 2009 ABC-CLIO

Abortion Politics in the Federal Courts

Right Versus Right

Barbara M. Yarnold Barbara M. Yarnold


May 1995

Praeger

Cover
Pages
Volumes
Size
Hardcover
176
1
6 1/8x9 1/4
 
ISBN
eISBN
978-0-275-95291-4
978-0-313-38816-3
Print in Stock
$103.95

add to cart

Offers a public law analysis of the political and legal progeny of Roe v. Wade.

In this analysis of federal court cases relying upon the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, the author finds that the pro-life movement in the United States has suffered repeated losses in abortion litigation. Additionally, her research indicates that, despite claims to the contrary, the pro-life movement is a loose collection of underfunded and understaffed public interest organizations. The pro-choice forces are vastly more powerful in abortion litigation, have superior organization and financing, and include not only public interest groups but also private interests such as clinics and professional medical organizations. Divided into three parts, the study begins with a public law analysis of the progeny of Roe cases, examining those variables which appear to impact court decisions. Next the work examines political factors and litigation resources as variables in explaining court decisions. And finally, the work offers a descriptive analysis of abortion litigants which divides the groups into major categories and evaluates them in terms of their resources, longevity, and other such factors. This book will be of interest to those seriously interested in the political and legal ramifications of the abortion controversy.
Introduction
Judicial Outputs
Do Courts Respond to the Political Clout of Groups or to Their Superior Litigation Resources/Repeat-Player Status?
Organizational Players in Abortion Litigation in the Federal Courts
Conclusion
Bibliography