
ODLIS
Online Dictionary for Library and Information Science
by Joan M. ReitzNow available in print! Order a copy of the hardcover or paperback from Libraries Unlimited.
Browse by letter: | About | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | JK | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | XYZ |
Christopher de Hamel notes in The British Library Guide to Manuscript Illumination (University of Toronto Press, 2001) that underdrawing was done in two stages. First, the overall composition was sketched in hard point, plummet, or charcoal, then the sketch was reworked by the artist in greater detail using pale ink. If the design involved geometric shapes, small holes in the parchment often reveal that a compass was used. Click here to see an underdrawing for a miniature to which gilding has been applied (Leaves of Gold) and here to see the underdrawing for a finished initial letter (The Illuminated Page). See also: overpainting.
Also used in reference to decoration never completed in a medieval manuscript. The Eadui Psalter of the 11th-century is a good example (British Library, Arundel 155). Unfinished decoration allows the researcher to study the methods by which manuscript illumination was accomplished.
Development of Unicode began in 1987 when Joe Becker and Lee Collins of Xerox and Mark Davis of Apple sought to devise a character set as simple as ASCII to meet the needs of the entire computing world. Joe Becker is credited with coining the term, which stands for "unique, universal, and uniform character encoding." The Research Libraries Group (RLG), developer of EACC, joined the project in its early stages, and in 1991 the Unicode Consortium was established to develop and promote the new standard. At the same time, the Joint Technical Committee 1 (JTC 1) of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) were also working on a global character set. In 1992, the two initiatives merged. Since then, Unicode has been synchronized with ISO/IEC 10646.
The current version of Unicode can define approximately 65,000 characters, with extensions to accommodate an additional 1 million characters. Duplication is avoided by assigning a single code when a character is common to more than one language. The standard also provides guidelines for sorting and searching, compression and transmission, transcoding to other standards, and truncation. Library issues center on the use of Unicode data in machine-readable bibliographic records, since large numbers of existing records are encoded in 7- and 8-bit character sets. The MARBI Committee of the American Library Association (ALA), responsible for advising the Library of Congress on the USMARC formats, has delegated work on the use of Unicode to its Subcommittee on Character Sets and to special task forces. Unicode is currently used in Java from Sun, Windows NT and Internet Explorer from Microsoft, Netscape Navigator, the Macintosh operating system from Apple, and database applications from Oracle, Sybase, etc. Many vendors of integrated library systems are moving toward implementation of Unicode in their systems. Click here to learn more about the Unicode Standard. See also: UTF-8.
Supported by the largest vendors of software and electronic information (Microsoft, AOL, Reed Elsevier, LexisNexis, Business Software Alliance, Information Technology Association of America, Software and Information Industry Association, etc.), UCITA was designed to make shrink-wrap and click-on licenses more enforceable; prohibit the transfer of licenses (pass-alongs) from one party to another without vendor permission; give vendors the right to repossess software by disabling it remotely if the vendor finds the customer in violation of the license; allow vendors to disclaim warranties for defective, bug-laden, or virus-infested software; and protect vendors from liability for defective products.
In response to criticisms voiced at hearings held in 2001 and recommendations made by the American Bar Association, NCCUSL approved 38 amendments to UCITA in August 2002, but the law continued to be opposed by Americans for Fair Electronic Commerce Transactions (AFFECT), formerly known as 4CITE, a broad-based coalition of retailers and manufacturers, consumers, financial services institutions, technology professionals, and libraries, and by a large number of state attorneys general, and even by the two leading associations of computing professionals, the ACM and IEEE.
The American Library Association, Association of Research Libraries, American Association of Law Libraries, Special Libraries Association, Medical Library Association, and Art Libraries Society joined AFFECT in actively opposing UCITA, citing its potentially negative impact on the fair use provisions of U.S. copyright law, the freedom to negotiate licensing agreements, and preservation of electronic resources. In September 2003, Library Journal announced that NCCUSL officially abandoned UCITA at its 112th annual meeting in August 2003, but because UCITA was enacted in Virginia and Maryland, contracts can name either state as the law governing a software license, even if the vendor has no presence in the state. Click here to learn more about the ALA position on UCITA.
- Example:
- http://www.myuniversity.edu/library/hours.html
The first part of the URL designates the TCP/IP protocol used to access the resource. In the example given above, http:// indicates that the resource is accessible through the Hypertext Transfer Protocol. In most Web browsers, the default setting in the "Open" or "Location" field is http:// so there is no need to include the protocol when opening a Web document. The remaining parts of a URL are separated by either a full stop (dot) or a slash. URLs are case sensitive. The six main protocols used in URLs are:
- ftp:// - FTP directory of downloadable data or program files
- gopher:// - Gopher server
- http:// - Document on the World Wide Web
- mailto: - Electronic mail (e-mail)
- news: - Usenet newsgroup
- telnet:// - Application program running on a remote host
- gopher:// - Gopher server
See also: IP address, OpenURL, and Persistent URL (PURL).
Also refers to the appearance of any element of a printed work that is repeated in the same style throughout the text, such as the chapter headings, running titles, headpieces or tailpieces, etc.
Also refers to the collective title used by convention to collocate publications of an author, composer, or corporate body in a single volume or set of volumes containing two or more complete works, or extracts from several works, usually of a particular literary or musical form (AACR2). Synonymous with filing title and standard title.
In serials cataloging, a heading created to distinguish between two serial publications of the same title, consisting of the title proper followed in parentheses by a unique qualifier, usually place of publication, corporate body, date, or a combination of two of these descriptive elements. For example, the heading The Bankers Magazine (Boston).
Developed by Henri La Fontaine and Paul Otlet of the Institut Internationale de Bibliographie, UDC was first published in a French edition in 1905. Adopted by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), it has been translated into many languages, is revised regularly by an international group, and has become the most widely used classification system in the world. The UDC Number is entered in the 080 field of the MARC record. Click here to connect to the Web site maintained by the UDC Consortium.
Also refers to a serial publication that does not bear an issue number or volume number, and to a print from an edition without numbers or accepted as belonging to a numbered edition although it lacks a number (for example, an artist's proof).
In employment, to reclassify a job at a higher grade, usually moving it to a higher pay scale.
Also refers to the generally accepted way in which a word, phrase, or language is used to express an idea in speech or writing, which may or may not be grammatically correct. Handbooks of English usage are available in the reference section of most academic libraries (example: The New Fowler's Modern English Usage).
Library issues concerning the USA Patriot Act (PL 107-56) fall into two main categories: (1) civil liberties, especially privacy and confidentiality of patron records, and (2) denial of access to information, such as the removal of information resources from publicly accessible government Web sites and from the Federal Depository Library Program. The Patriot Act redefines "business records" to include medical, library, and educational records. Under Section 215, law enforcement agencies can compel libraries to produce circulation records, patron registration information, Internet usage records, etc., stored in or on any medium, by presenting a search warrant obtained in a nonadversarial hearing before a Federal Intelligence Surveillance Court closed to public scrutiny. The law also includes a "gag order" prohibiting any library or librarian from disclosing the existence of such a warrant, even to the person whose records have been inspected and/or seized.
In early December 2005, with 16 provisions of the Patriot Act due to expire under a "sunset clause" at the end of the month, a House-approved compromise bill that would have made 14 of the provisions permanent and extended two others (including Section 215) was blocked by a bipartisan filibuster. A five-week extension was approved before adjournment on December 22, and on February 3, 2006, Congress passed another short-term extension until March 10. Then on February 9, four Republican senators who opposed reauthorization in December announced that they had reached an agreement with the White House on revisions. On March 7, the revised bill passed the House by a vote of 280 to 138, making permanent most of the provisions of the original Patriot Act, but allowing the gag order to be challenged after a period of one year. Agents will no longer be able to use National Security Letters (NSLs) (subpoenas that do not require court approval) to obtain electronic records from libraries functioning in their traditional capacity, but libraries and consortia functioning as Internet Service Providers (ISPs) remain subject to NSLs. Most of the reforms sought by the American Library Association (ALA) and other representatives of the library community were not included in the revised bill, but a further four-year sunset clause requires Congress to reauthorize the Patriot Act by December 31, 2009.
The ALA Office of Intellectual Freedom maintains the Web site USA PATRIOT Act and Intellectual Freedom. The Electronic Privacy Information Center provides the text of the Act. Click here to view a chart created by Mary Minow of LLRX.com showing how the Patriot Act changed the way the federal government can request library records. For a more detailed discussion, see Refuge of a Scoundrel: The Patriot Act in Libraries (Libraries Unlimited, 2004) by Herbert N. Foerstel. See also: Library Awareness Program.
- Examples:
- Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):
- Domestic violence
- USE Family violence
- Family violence
- UF Domestic violence
- Domestic violence
- Thesaurus of ERIC Descriptors:
- Physical Disabilities
- UF Physical Handicaps
- Physical Handicaps
- USE Physical Disabilities
- Physical Disabilities
- Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):
Also refers to a group of users of a service or software/hardware product (or brand of products) who meet periodically and keep in contact, usually via e-mail, to enhance their understanding of the product, discuss any problems they experience, and suggest improvements to the vendor. Systems librarians often participate in the user group for their library's catalog software.
- To find entities that correspond to the user's stated search criteria
- To identify an entity
- To select an entity appropriate to the user's needs
- To acquire or obtain access to the entity described
To learn more, see Section 6: User Tasks of the FRBR Final Report.
Browse by letter: | About | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | JK | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | XYZ |