ABC-CLIO

Inherent Rights, the Written Constitution, and Popular Sovereignty

The Founders' Understanding

by Thomas B. McAffee

Print Flyer
Abortion in the United States

July 2000

Praeger

Pages 200
Volumes 1
Size 6 1/8x9 1/4
Topics Politics, Law, and Government/Human Rights and Civil Liberties
Description

In recent decades the Ninth Amendment, a provision designed to clarify that the federal government was to be one of enumerated and limited powers, has been turned into an unenumerated rights clause that effectively grants unlimited power to the judiciary. Was this the intent of the framers of the Constitution? McAffee argues that the founders had a rather different set of priorities than ours, and that the goal of enforcing fundamental human rights was not why they drafted any of the first ten amendments. They did not intend to grant to the courts the power to generate fundamental rights, whether by reference to custom or history, reason or natural law, or societal values or consensus.

It has become increasingly popular to identify our constitutional order as an experiment in the protection of fundamental human rights and to forget that it is also an experiment in self-government. As fundamental as the founding generation believed basic rights to be, they saw popular authority to make decisions about government as being even more central to the project in which they were engaged. They supported natural law and rights, but they felt strongly that those rights did not bind the people or their government unless they were inserted in the written Constitution. They did not contemplate that there would be unwritten limitations on the powers granted to government.

Table of Contents

The Modern Debate Over Inherent Constitutional Rights: What is at Stake?
State Constitutions in the Early American Republic: The Experiment With Republican Government
Constitutional Practice in the Confederation Period: The Search for Effective Limits on Legislative Power
The Decision at the Philadelphia Convention: The Federal System as Bill of Rights
The Ratification-Era Debate Over the Omission of a Bill of Rights: The Constitution as Fundamental Positive Law
The Ninth Amendment and Modern Constitutional Theory

Other Titles of Interest

Silenced! cover imageThe ABC-CLIO Companion to the Disability Rights Movement cover imageThe Logic of Black Urban Rebellions cover image
Opposing Hate Speech cover imageFree Expression and Censorship in America cover imageCivil Rights and Race Relations in the Post Reagan-Bush Era cover image

Product Search

Product Search

Publication Year

Format










Imprint

Need Help? Try our Search Tips